[olug] Linux mess

Mike Peterson mpeterson at charles.omhcoxmail.com
Wed Dec 19 02:36:39 UTC 2001


I will see if the program even runs as a regular user and get back to the
list with the results.
Thanks for the input.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Brian Roberson" <roberson at bstc.net>
To: <olug at bstc.net>
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 4:23 PM
Subject: Re: [olug] Linux mess


> all I have to say about your prediciment....
> running process like these as root is not a very good idea...
> If you run it as a regular user, there is alot of safegaurds in place that
> will not let you destroy a system.... If you are root... well, you can
> basically blow up the system without it asking you twice about it.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mike Peterson" <mpeterson at charles.omhcoxmail.com>
> To: <olug at bstc.net>
> Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 7:48 PM
> Subject: [olug] Linux mess
>
>
> Has anyone ever written a C program that messed up the 2.4 kernel so bad
> that it would not reboot and would not let you access the last file system
> that you were running the program on?
>
> I have a disk I/O benchmark program that I have been working with over the
> years that I modified this weekend so that it displays the results to the
> screen and logs the results to a file and it performs a large number of
runs
> so that it takes hours to run on a 233 MHz system.
>
> I was running Redhat 7.2 this weekend with 128 MB RAM on a 233 MHz system
> with ext3 files systems and RAID1 also running.
>
> In the program I have a character array that write the benchmark lines and
I
> made an error in upgrading the program and was locked out of the home file
> system and could log into the system as root but it would not reboot with
> the reboot or ctrl-alt-Del command. It would not shutdown -h now either. I
> reset the system and if I ran the program for a short run I would get a
> Segmentation Fault but it would run to completion before the Fault
occurred.
>
> The compile caught part of the errors but there was enough problems that
> were in the final executable that the kernel was trashed so to speak.
>
> When I was learning C I used to do these type of things to DOS 3.3 and had
> to power off the system and could not do a Ctrl-ALT-DEL.
>
> Just wondering if anyone has had Linux appear to do the same thing with
> other applications.
>
> I had heard about the Memory hang-up problem in the 2.4 kernel but this
was
> not it.
>
> I have the code of the working program and the bad one if anyone wants to
do
> Disk I/O benchmarking or want to try to mess up a 2.5 kernel and see if it
> protects itself or can protect itself any better.
>
>
>
>
> -_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_
>
> For help contact olug-help at bstc.net - run by ezmlm
> to unsubscribe, send mail to olug-unsubscribe at bstc.net
> or `mail olug-unsubscribe at bstc.net < /dev/null`
> (c)2001 OLUG http://www.olug.org
>
> -_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_
>
>



-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_

For help contact olug-help at bstc.net - run by ezmlm
to unsubscribe, send mail to olug-unsubscribe at bstc.net
or `mail olug-unsubscribe at bstc.net < /dev/null`
(c)2001 OLUG http://www.olug.org

-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_




More information about the OLUG mailing list