[olug] OT: Seeking Information on Borland C++ CLI for M$
Don Kauffman
dkauffman at tconl.com
Wed Nov 20 23:19:02 UTC 2002
I've tried Cygwin but found that it doesn't compile the M$ headers. (M$
is not necessarily ANSI compliant.) I know, I know, why am I wanting
to do this when I have Linux as an option? Because the online course
I'm taking uses them
I'm not a big fan of M$ but I will use it. I will try the mingw compiler
first. But I would still like to get Borland to working.
Thanks Daniel and BIll,
Don Kauffman
William E. Kempf wrote:
>Daniel Pfile said:
>
>
>>I don't remember having a problem with that compiler, but I was using
>>it on NT 4 and Win2k.
>>
>>I'd recommend getting cygwin. http://www.cygwin.com/
>>
>>
>
>Depending on your needs, this is a rather invasive solution. I'm not
>knocking it, as I use Cygwin myself, but if all you need is a C++
>compiler, installing a full POSIX environment is overkill.
>
>
>
>>It's free, and you can run gcc on it.
>>
>>
>
>Some other options:
>
>* The MinGW compiler (based on gcc) is available from
>http://www.mingw.org/. This doesn't require the POSIX environment supplied
>with Cygwin, and as such is a better alternative if you don't need POSIX.
>
>* The Microsoft compilers are available for free with the .Net Framework
>SDK from http://msdn.microsoft.com/netframework/downloads/howtoget.asp (If
>you're a MS basher, don't bother responding.)
>
>William E. Kempf
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>OLUG mailing list
>OLUG at olug.org
>http://lists.olug.org/mailman/listinfo/olug
>
>
>
>
More information about the OLUG
mailing list