Reply to rant: [olug] server life span
David Walker
linux_user at grax.com
Fri Sep 27 15:30:37 UTC 2002
Thanks for the excellent explanation. I now realize that I need one. Which
one do you recommend. I am, of course, interested in price, performance,
redundancy, and the ability to manage it easily through the command line or a
web interface.
On Friday 27 September 2002 09:47 am, olug-admin at olug.org wrote:
> A SAN (Storage Area Network) moves the physical storage from the server to
> a central appliance. The server gets a fibrechannel card which appears to
> the OS as a SCSI controller. The FC card connects to the SAN appliance
> which presents to the server OS x-number of virtual disks. With some SAN's
> you can even have boot bios on the FC card to allow for the server to be
> completely diskless.
>
> The advantage of a diskless server is that you can swap out the server
> hardware without losing your OS and data. Just pull the FC card, replace
> the server, put the FC card in the new server and turn it on. Your done.
>
> The real strength of a SAN is that you can manipulate your disks without
> disturbing your data or taking your servers offline. You can resize,
> mirror, swap, and add disks without your users knowing anything. Some SAN
> appliances even allow you to upgrade your disks in the array without taking
> it offline.
>
> Bill
>
> ***********Reply separator*************
>
>
>
> "Don E. Kauffman"
> <dkauffman at tconl. To: olug at olug.org
> com> cc:
> Sent by: Subject: Re: Reply to rant:
> [olug] server life span olug-admin at olug.o
> rg
>
>
> 09/26/2002 04:31
> PM
> Please respond to
> olug
>
>
>
>
>
>
> For those of us who are in the newbie category. what's a SAN? How is it
> different than a normal server / network?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Don
>
> O
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OLUG mailing list
> OLUG at olug.org
> http://lists.olug.org/mailman/listinfo/olug
More information about the OLUG
mailing list