[olug] Re: Wireless Help
Joe Catanzaro
joecatanzaro at cox.net
Sat Oct 25 22:05:55 UTC 2003
Dan,
Thanks for the reply. Yes, I didn't have a route pointing from my
firewall/default gateway to the 10.0.1.0/24 subnet. Also, I ran tcpdump on
the firewall and the RH 7.3 box and the ICMP traffic is reaching its
destination, but not properly returning. I've added 2 routes on the RH 7.3
box. One for traffic coming from my wireless subnet, and one for traffic
coming from my wired subnet. I've also added a route on my firewall for
traffic headed toward the wireless subnet. And after all that, pings still
aren't hitting their targets. I've been using the following route command.
Am I doing something wrong?
route add -net 10.0.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 dev wlan0
And I've been trying to duplicate the table at the bottom of this
page. http://www.busan.edu/~nic/networking/tcpip/ch02_05.htm
Also, here are my current routing tables.
RH 7.3 Box
[root at scooter root]# netstat -nr
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt Iface
10.0.0.0 10.0.0.5 255.255.255.0 UG 40 0 0 eth0
10.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 40 0 0 eth0
10.0.1.0 10.0.1.1 255.255.255.0 UG 40 0 0 wlan0
10.0.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 40 0 0 wlan0
127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 40 0 0 lo
0.0.0.0 10.0.0.1 0.0.0.0 UG 40 0 0 eth0
Firewall
[root at ip68-96-137-74 rc.d]# netstat -nr
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt Iface
10.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 40 0 0 eth1
10.0.1.0 10.0.0.5 255.255.255.0 UG 40 0 0 eth1
68.96.136.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.252.0 U 40 0 0 eth0
127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 40 0 0 lo
0.0.0.0 68.96.136.1 0.0.0.0 UG 40 0 0 eth0
Any ideas on what I'm doing wrong?
Thanks,
At 10/22/2003 11:33 AM Wednesday, you wrote:
>Joe wrote:
> > I can ping the RH wi-fi interface (10.0.1.1) from the laptop and I
> > can also ping the wired interface (10.0.0.5) from the laptop, but
>nothing
> > beyond that. So, I'm assuming I have a routing issue on the RH box.
>I'm
> > missing something obvious, but I don't know what. Here are the
>details.
> > Any ideas? Thanks,
>
>www --- Firewall --- RH 7.3 box ~~~ Win 98 laptop
> 10.0.0.1 10.0.0.5 10.0.1.1
>10.0.1.38
>
>If you are able to ping both interfaces of the RH7.3 "router" device
>from the Win98 laptop, then the routing/forwarding piece appears to be
>working.
>
>When you ping something on the 10.0.0.X/24 network, does that machine
>have a route entry for the 10.0.1.X/24 network? Example: If you have
>another machine at 10.0.0.50, does it have a route to the 10.0.1.X/24
>network pointing to 10.0.0.5? I would guess that the packet is making
>it to .50, but then .50 is sending the response via 10.0.0.1 rather than
>10.0.0.5.
>
>Depending on the other systems you have, you could use either Ethereal
>or tcpdump on the 10.0.0.50 machine to see if it is seeing the traffic.
>
>Dan
>_______________________________________________
>OLUG mailing list
>OLUG at olug.org
>http://lists.olug.org/mailman/listinfo/olug
Joe Catanzaro
joecatanzaro at cox.net
More information about the OLUG
mailing list