[olug] Linux Filesystems

[Brian Roberson]

I have used reiserFS for production and personal use machines for years. Even before SuSE
made it the default FS on their install. It is a very well rounded journalling FS. 
A few years ago it was a pain for recovery since most rescues systems around
at that time did not have reiserFS utils. ( not that I needed a canned rescue ) ... 

ReiserFS teamed with LVM is a beautiful match and has served me well in very heavy 
use environtments, both DB and app serving (large and small file, and many files per dir)





On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 03:45:05PM -0500, Tim - DZ wrote:
> For "production" stuff I'm being a wuss and sticking with ext3.
> 
> My personal mythtv box outgrew an ext3 so I added another couple hundred GB
> of XFS, which is working beautifully.  And with apt-get and atrpms it only
> took about 2 minutes to set it up on Fedora Core 1.
> 
> -t 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: olug-bounces at olug.org [mailto:olug-bounces at olug.org] On Behalf Of
> Michael Peterson
> Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 1:31 PM
> To: olug at olug.org
> Subject: [olug] Linux Filesystems
> 
> Is anyone on the list running XFS for a file system type for all
> partitions on  a Linux Server?
> If so, how are things going?
> Are there any issues with XFS?
> Is performance as good as expected?
> 
> If not, which file system type are you running or do your prefer to use on
> a Linux Server?
> Ext3, ReiserFS, JFS, or Ext2 other than XFS?
> Or others if they are supported.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OLUG mailing list
> OLUG at olug.org
> http://lists.olug.org/mailman/listinfo/olug
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OLUG mailing list
> OLUG at olug.org
> http://lists.olug.org/mailman/listinfo/olug