[olug] Amarok 2 is finally out.

[Gabe Kangas]

Has anyone tried the Windows port of Amarok yet?  It was something years 
ago I was hoping for.  But I don't care so much now :)  I'll have to 
give it a shot in OS X...

-Gabe

T. J. Brumfield wrote:
> I believe that Amarok 2's ability to sync with mobile devices isn't on
> par with 1.4 yet from what I read.  Amarok 1.4 uses dbus to
> communicate with devices, but Amarok 2 likely uses Solid now.
>
> Honestly, I am a little curious to give Amarok 2 a test run on
> Windows.  That is my primary attraction to Amarok 2 at the moment.
>
> -- T. J.
>
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 4:40 PM,  <stabbymctwist.x at gmail.com> wrote:
>   
>> On Wednesday 17 December 2008 11:03:16 am T. J. Brumfield wrote:
>>     
>>> Frankly I avoid Apple products because of their proprietary, locked
>>> nature.  I understand many aspects of their popularity, but for
>>> precisely the same reasons I don't like Microsoft, I don't like Apple.
>>>       
>> Oddly enough, Amarok has pretty good iPod support.  I don't know about 2.0
>> yet, I've had trouble compiling it, but 1.4 supported my iPod classic maybe a
>> month after it came out.  I avoid Apple stuff now, I didn't know about it at
>> the time.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OLUG mailing list
>> OLUG at olug.org
>> https://lists.olug.org/mailman/listinfo/olug
>>
>>     
>
>
>
>