[olug] OT: Virtualization - Server Spec's

[Brian Roberson]

The new cisco servers look sexy... 64gb per blade!

On Apr 8, 2009, at 1:36 PM, Curtis LaMasters  
<curtislamasters at gmail.com> wrote:

> SSD Video was neat.  Awesome numbers.  What is everyone's
> favorite/best virtualization server.  I.E. Charles mentioned that the
> 1950's are limited by the disk/bus combo...what hardware has been
> kicking butt for you.
>
> Anyone have experience with the Dell R series?
>
> Curtis LaMasters
> http://www.curtis-lamasters.com
> http://www.builtnetworks.com
>
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 1:24 PM, Sam Tetherow <tetherow at shwisp.net>  
> wrote:
>> Cali Lewis had a video on Geekbrief.tv about a guy who built a  
>> beast of
>> a box using a bunch of SSDs.  Not sure how accurate some of the stuff
>> was but it looked pretty cool.
>>
>> http://bit.ly/msRs
>>
>>    Sam Tetherow
>>
>> charles.bird at powerdnn.com wrote:
>>> I've been wanting to try a couple of the newer Ocz ssd drives and  
>>> see how they do with certain tasks, virtualization being one of  
>>> them(low capacity I know)
>>>
>>>
>>> ------Original Message------
>>> From: Obi-Wan
>>> Sender: olug-bounces at olug.org
>>> To: olug at olug.org
>>> ReplyTo: Omaha Linux User Group
>>> Subject: Re: [olug] OT: Virtualization - Server Spec's
>>> Sent: Apr 8, 2009 10:50 AM
>>>
>>>
>>>> For machine simulation-type virtualization like VMware ESX the
>>>> bottlenecks will be in this order:
>>>>
>>>> Memory
>>>> Disk - capacity and I/Os
>>>> CPU
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yeah, that sounds about right.
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OLUG mailing list
>> OLUG at olug.org
>> https://lists.olug.org/mailman/listinfo/olug
>>
> _______________________________________________
> OLUG mailing list
> OLUG at olug.org
> https://lists.olug.org/mailman/listinfo/olug