[olug] Bind Vulnerability
Rob Townley
rob.townley at gmail.com
Thu Jul 30 03:57:27 UTC 2009
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 7:38 PM, Shawn L. Djernes<shawn at djernes.org> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Here is a recently posted problem in Bind 9: https://www.isc.org/node/474
>
> Please Update.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iD8DBQFKcOugyF1ZojV7+hoRAoMwAJ4xhU4N4HBRf0ObctM3Z5moI/fAhgCffKva
> 3IcRqNlj5hCndzx7y3suQn4=
> =2nnS
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OLUG mailing list
> OLUG at olug.org
> https://lists.olug.org/mailman/listinfo/olug
>
i use bind but wonder why when there are so many alternatives such as:
djbdns, mydns, pdns, mdns, dnsjava, dnsmasq, maradns, nsd, unbound.
Many of these have an optional database backend for replication and
optional webserver frontend for the noobs. dnsmasq combines a dhcpd
and dnsd.
pdns-backend-mysql
pdns-backend-postgressql
pdns-backend-sqlite
More information about the OLUG
mailing list