[olug] Community Colo Project

[Curtis LaMasters]

What's complex about it?  I have found pfsense much simpler to
configure typical features minus BGP compared to Cisco or Juniper and
I originally came from a Cisco background.  We can take this offline,
I'm fine with that.

Curtis LaMasters
http://www.curtis-lamasters.com
http://www.builtnetworks.com



On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Phil Brutsche <phil at brutsche.us> wrote:
> By big problem with most FOSS routers and firewalls is the complexity,
> both in the hardware and the software.
>
> I never liked pfsense and always preferred the original m0n0wall exactly
> for that reason.
>
> Curtis LaMasters wrote:
>> I would vote FOSS for the firewall/router setup (pfsense or vyetta)
>> would work fine.  I could donate time for sure and hardware possibly
>> to accomplish that.  With pfsense we would have the ability to do VPN,
>> IDS/IPS, Failover, and even BGP if required, however, I'm with Phil
>> that BGP it's overkill. However, I do have one somewhat dumb question?
>>  What would you all put on the your community DC hosted servers?
>
> --
>
> Phil Brutsche
> phil at brutsche.us
> _______________________________________________
> OLUG mailing list
> OLUG at olug.org
> https://lists.olug.org/mailman/listinfo/olug
>