[olug] Ping Is Broken

[Jarek Poplawski]

On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 02:14:13PM -0500, Rob Townley wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 4:47 AM, Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 09-10-2009 18:44, Rob Townley wrote:
> >> ping -I is broken
> >>
> >> The following deals with bug in ping that made it very difficult to set up a
> >> system with two gateways.
> >>
> >> Demonstration that *ping -I is broken*. When specifying the source
> >> interface using -I with an *ethX* alias and that interface is not the
> >> default gateway
> >> interface, then ping fails. When specifying the interface as an ip address,
> >> ping works. Search for "Destination Host Unreachable" to find the bug.
> >>
> >>
> >> eth*0* = 4.3.2.8 and the default gateway is accessed through a different
> >> interface eth*1*.
> >> eth*1* = 192.168.168.155 is used as the device to get to the default
> >> gateway.
> >> *FAILS *: ping *-I eth0* 208.67.222.222
> >> *WORKS*: ping *-I 4.3.2.8* 208.67.222.222
> >> *WORKS*: ping *-I eth1* 208.67.222.222
> >> *WORKS*: ping *-I 192.168.168.155* 208.67.222.222
> > ...
> >> man ping:
> >>    -I interface address
> >>         Set source address to specified interface address.
> >>         Argument may be *numeric IP address or name of device*.
> >>         When  pinging  IPv6  link-local  address  this option is required.
> >
> > It seems this description might be misleading that IP address and name
> > of device are equivalent here, while they are treated a bit different.
> > The device name is additionally used in a sendmsg message, probably to
> > guarantee the device is really used (not its address only), so it
> > looks like intended.
> >
> >> ping -V returns the latest available on CentOS and Fedora and the
> >> maintainers website:
> >> ping utility, iputils-ss020927
> >
> > I guess the patch below could do what you expect in this case, but
> > rather "man" should be fixed...
> 
> Thank you for the patch.  i will test it. i was trying to find the
> problem using gdb and figure out a patch myself.
> 
> ping used to work the way i expected many many years ago on various
> *nix systems.

This patch is rather to show the main difference a device name could
make here. IMHO it should work in your case (I didn't test it), but
as a matter of fact I'm not sure it's the way (route) you expected.

> Besides, traceroute is broken by the same problem except that
> traceroute is much more explicit with a -i and -s parameters.  Who
> knows what else is broken by all the meddling in interface name
> aliases without testing.
> 
> MultiNic / MultiGatewayed machines are hard enough in Linux, lets not
> give users a reason to use BSD or Windows.

Linux routing, especially multipath, might be simply different than
others, but I wouldn't call it broken (except when it's broken ;-).
In this case I don't think it's proven enough: if you change the
default route to eth0's in your example it should show there is some
consistency in it.

It seems "-I eth0" should mean something else than "-I ip_address"
yet (where it can matter), and ping does it. It's only not documented
enough.

Jarek P.