[olug] VMWare Player vs VirtualBox
Phil Brutsche
phil at brutsche.us
Tue Nov 23 20:03:03 UTC 2010
+1 on ESXi/vSphere.
The top 2 reasons I don't use Xen: a desire for a consistent
virtualization platform and the system requirements - a 64-bit processor
with VT-x.
A lot of the spare hardware I have won't run unmodified guests in Xen -
32-bit only or no VT-x. ESXi/vSphere is the only hypervisor platform
that will run on all of it; ESXi VMs are compatible with vSphere, and
you can create VMs in vSphere that will run in ESXi.
On 11/23/2010 1:44 PM, Jason N wrote:
> If you have a spare box lieing around, why not try Vmware's Free
> vSphere Hypervisor (formerly ESXi) or Xen or Xenserver (Citrix)?
--
Phil Brutsche
phil at brutsche.us
More information about the OLUG
mailing list