[olug] Computer Room Fire Suppression
Sam Tetherow
tetherow at shwisp.net
Wed Jun 1 16:22:54 UTC 2011
As a tax payer, I feel the pain. The only way this would make sense is
if it can be proven that the 'insurance' cost exceeds the replacement
cost both in $$ and man hours. Otherwise the public sector is doing a
great disservice to it's constituents.
On 6/1/11 11:16 AM, Bill Brush wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 11:04 AM, Hurley, Rod<RHurley at tenaska.com> wrote:
>> Case made below.
>
> You're looking at it wrong.
>
> Public sector operates differently than the private sector. For a
> private sector entity, allocating money as an insurance policy make
> sense because a disaster is an existential threat. For public sector
> entities there is no such thing as a disaster caused existential
> threat, so why commit current money to an insurance policy that's not
> needed? Looking at LPS, it doesn't matter how bad the disaster is,
> they're going to get money to rebuild and the new facilities will be
> better than the old facilities. A large scale disaster will actually
> turn out to be a good thing in the end for a public entity because
> their processes will be updated, their systems upgraded, and no one
> will personally feel any pain because of it. The management might get
> a raise for helping guide the department through the difficult time,
> no one will be fired, and everyone gets new computers and chairs.
>
> For a private business, a large scale disaster will lead to pretty
> much the exact opposite. People will be laid off, the bare minimum
> replacement hardware will be acquired, and whatever facilities can be
> obtained for a small fee will be used.
>
> Bill
> _______________________________________________
> OLUG mailing list
> OLUG at olug.org
> https://lists.olug.org/mailman/listinfo/olug
More information about the OLUG
mailing list