[olug] Computer Room Fire Suppression

Sam Tetherow tetherow at shwisp.net
Wed Jun 1 16:22:54 UTC 2011


As a tax payer, I feel the pain.  The only way this would make sense is 
if it can be proven that the 'insurance' cost exceeds the replacement 
cost both in $$ and man hours.  Otherwise the public sector is doing a 
great disservice to it's constituents.

On 6/1/11 11:16 AM, Bill Brush wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 11:04 AM, Hurley, Rod<RHurley at tenaska.com>  wrote:
>> Case made below.
>
> You're looking at it wrong.
>
> Public sector operates differently than the private sector.  For a
> private sector entity, allocating money as an insurance policy make
> sense because a disaster is an existential threat.  For public sector
> entities there is no such thing as a disaster caused existential
> threat, so why commit current money to an insurance policy that's not
> needed?  Looking at LPS, it doesn't matter how bad the disaster is,
> they're going to get money to rebuild and the new facilities will be
> better than the old facilities.  A large scale disaster will actually
> turn out to be a good thing in the end for a public entity because
> their processes will be updated, their systems upgraded, and no one
> will personally feel any pain because of it.  The management might get
> a raise for helping guide the department through the difficult time,
> no one will be fired, and everyone gets new computers and chairs.
>
> For a private business, a large scale disaster will lead to pretty
> much the exact opposite.  People will be laid off, the bare minimum
> replacement hardware will be acquired, and whatever facilities can be
> obtained for a small fee will be used.
>
> Bill
> _______________________________________________
> OLUG mailing list
> OLUG at olug.org
> https://lists.olug.org/mailman/listinfo/olug




More information about the OLUG mailing list