[olug] Tor could be all the more important

[Dave Rowe]

Where did you read that?  It referenced an early draft from 18 months
ago would only track that information.

>From the beginning of the article:
"A last-minute rewrite of the bill expands the information that
commercial Internet providers are required to store to include
customers' names, addresses, phone numbers, credit card numbers, bank
account numbers, and temporarily-assigned IP addresses, some committee
members suggested. By a 7-16 vote, the panel rejected an amendment
that would have clarified that only IP addresses must be stored."

On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Kevin <sharpestmarble at gmail.com> wrote:
> According to TFA, it was just accounting stuff and DHCP IPs that would
> be tracked(name, address, bank account/CC#). Actual traffic and
> connections wouldn't be logged.
>
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 10:36, T. J. Brumfield <enderandrew at gmail.com> wrote:
>> There has been evidence that Tor isn't really anonymous and can be tracked
>> back to you. On top of that, they're talking ISP sniffing, so they're
>> grabbing your data directly from your connection to the internet. So they'll
>> have your MAC, and all your traffic.
>>
>> In the end, I'm not worried too much because ultimately I don't have
>> anything to hide. But this should be just like any other kind of search, and
>> dependent on a warrant. I'm not sure why warrantless tracking and searches
>> are suddenly acceptable.
>>
>> http://xkcd.com/538/
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 10:32 AM, <jman at miwire.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>   I keep all for at least one year....
>>>
>>>   Kelly Williams <kellywilliams81 at gmail.com> wrote ..
>>>
>>> Ok I agree with you for the children, but our privacy like emails to
>>> loved ones or IMs to that special someone that you love. In a way I am
>>> glad I am cutting my internet service and use public internet. But using
>>> https and tor with a proxy. Plus if sending a file to online backup
>>> encrypt it before I send it....
>>>
>>>
>>> On 7/29/2011 10:02 AM, Kevin wrote:
>>> > But think of the children! What will protect them from Internet
>>> > Pornographers?!?! :rolleyes:
>>> >
>>> > On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 09:55, Dave Rowe  wrote:
>>> >> Using utilities like Tor and what not for protecting traffic - even
>>> >> legit, 'normal' traffic.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> http://news.cnet.com/8301-31921_3-20084939-281/house-panel-approves-broadene
>>> d-isp-snooping-bill/?tag=mantle_skin;content
>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>> >> OLUG mailing list
>>> >> OLUG at olug.org
>>> >> https://lists.olug.org/mailman/listinfo/olug
>>> >>
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > OLUG mailing list
>>> > OLUG at olug.org
>>> > https://lists.olug.org/mailman/listinfo/olug
>>> >
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OLUG mailing list
>>> OLUG at olug.org
>>> https://lists.olug.org/mailman/listinfo/olug
>>>
>>>
>>> ****************************************************************************
>>>   ******* Science says all matter in the universe to be made up of
>>> essentially
>>>   five things. 1. Electron 2. Up quark 3. Down quark 4. Neutron 5. Photon
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OLUG mailing list
>>> OLUG at olug.org
>>> https://lists.olug.org/mailman/listinfo/olug
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OLUG mailing list
>> OLUG at olug.org
>> https://lists.olug.org/mailman/listinfo/olug
>>
> _______________________________________________
> OLUG mailing list
> OLUG at olug.org
> https://lists.olug.org/mailman/listinfo/olug
>